Cell Phones and Social Media in Family Law Litigation: “Don’t say, or do, anything online, or via text, that you wouldn’t say, or do, in front of the judge.”

This is a very difficult subject to try to give advice upon because most of us are not feeling what you are feeling in that moment when you press “send” or “post.” During the family law litigation process emotions are high and reactions are rapid and unpredictable. To even the most calm and centered of […]

Read More

Taylor v. Taylor

Taylor v Taylor In Taylor v. Taylor, the 2d DCA reverses an award of durational, rather than permanent, alimony. The identified problem essentially was twofold, but really comes down to an absence of statutory findings. There is a lack of findings necessary to support the use of durational rather than permanent alimony, and the amount […]

Read More

Kelley v. Kelley

Kelley v Kelley In Kelly v. Kelly, the 4th DCA reversed and remanded the final judgment on the issues of equitable distribution and alimony. As to ED, the trial court had stated its intention to make equal awards to the parties, but a mathematical error in the equalizing payment made the award significantly unequal. As […]

Read More

Some Thanksgiving Thoughts

For this Thanksgiving issue of the Men’s Rights Blog, let’s take a minute to acknowledge some practical pieces of advice that family law litigants can use to help facilitate the difficult process of dealing with divorce and custody issues. During this trying time, it is easy to get lost in all the stress, and even […]

Read More

Gentile v. Gentile

In Gentile v. Gentile, the 4th DCA reversed and remanded a case for further proceedings. The parties’ settlement agreement, announced on the record, split a parcel of land and left the valuation of that splitting to binding mediation, but the mediator did not utilize the division as contemplated by the settlement agreement (which included a […]

Read More

Bailey v. Bailey

Bailey v. Bailey concerned the granting by the trial court of a motion for psychosocial and substance abuse evaluation. The Appellate court quashed the order because the motion was filed the same day as the hearing, and thus there was inadequate notice. The evidence that was adduced suggested that some type of psychological evaluation might […]

Read More

Rutan v. Rutan

Rutan v. Rutan is a case that had been previously remanded for findings. The 2d DCA again remanded the case for findings justifying its award of alimony. The trial court (in Pinellas County) found that the Wife had met her burden of proving ability to pay, but the findings are insufficient to allow the appellate […]

Read More