In Gentile v. Gentile, the 4th DCA reversed and remanded a case for further proceedings. The parties’ settlement agreement, announced on the record, split a parcel of land and left the valuation of that splitting to binding mediation, but the mediator did not utilize the division as contemplated by the settlement agreement (which included a small part of the land with canal access). Thus, the trial court should not have adopted the mediation report; as it did not resolve the issue that was sent to mediation in the first place.