In McGlynn vs. Tallman-McGlynn, we are reminded that if you include bonus income in your financial affidavit but want to argue that it should not be included in net income for alimony or child support, you should be prepared to present evidence supporting the claim that the bonus income is non-recurring. Also, the Former Husband complained that the combined effect of alimony, child support, and other payments he was ordered to pay results in him being unable to live, but the evidence showed that the combined obligations left him with almost $2,500 per month, which is deemed sufficient under the facts of the case.