Last week, the Florida Legislature introduced four separate pieces of legislation of note. Three of the bills introduced deal with alimony, and the fourth deals with timesharing/parenting plans. The three bills dealing with alimony (House Bill 455 and Senate bills 250 and 668) have different language, which we have not yet looked into. We do […]
Tag: Men’s Rights Florida
Taylor v. Taylor
Taylor v Taylor In Taylor v. Taylor, the 2d DCA reverses an award of durational, rather than permanent, alimony. The identified problem essentially was twofold, but really comes down to an absence of statutory findings. There is a lack of findings necessary to support the use of durational rather than permanent alimony, and the amount […]
Possible Alimony Law Changes In The Works
In this edition of the Men’s Rights Law Firm blog, we will discuss the pending alimony law changes that could become reality in the near future. The following is in an FAQ format, and may hold answers to questions by those facing unjust alimony obligations in their divorce decrees: 1. What are your thoughts on […]
Lessons Learned in Divorce Litigation
To paraphrase Santayana: those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. Here are a few of the lessons I have learned in almost two and a half decades of divorce litigation: Wait too long to file for divorce/modification/enforcement. The date of filing a divorce has the important distinction of […]
Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch
A case that was talked about extensively at last year’s certification review in Orlando, Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch, has returned, this time with the Supreme Court weighing in and approving the 4th DCAs opinion. The case involves interpretation of prenuptial agreements. The 2d DCA case of Irwin v. Irwin and the 3d DCA case of Valdes […]
Rutan v. Rutan
Rutan v. Rutan is a case that had been previously remanded for findings. The 2d DCA again remanded the case for findings justifying its award of alimony. The trial court (in Pinellas County) found that the Wife had met her burden of proving ability to pay, but the findings are insufficient to allow the appellate […]
Berg v. Young
Berg v. Young concerns the interpretation of a prenuptial agreement. Ultimately the 4th DCA reversed the finding regarding a denial of attorney’s fees because the prevailing party should have been awarded his fees based upon a plain reading of the agreement. Also reversed was the award to the wife of attorney’s fees based upon section […]
What assets and liabilities are considered marital, and how are they divided under Florida law?
Florida Statute 61.075 sets out criteria for classifying assets and liabilities. The first step to understanding what you and your significant other have in the marital estate is to determine two key periods of time. First, you must determine the date of your marriage. That date will be the starting point for classifying marital versus […]
Temares v. Temares
In Temares v. Temares, the appellate court reversed an order for compulsory mental health and substance abuse evaluation. There was no good cause for the evaluations. The “in controversy” and “good cause” requirements for a compulsory evaluation require an affirmative showing by the movant that each condition as to which the examination is sought is […]
Timesharing and Custody Factors
When Florida courts fashion timesharing plans, there are multiple factors which the Court must consider to determine the plan that is in the best interest of the children. The factors considered by the Court can be found in Florida Statute 61.13(3). It is important to understand each factor and to do your best to follow […]