In Stusch vs. Jiruska, the appellate court reversed and remanded an order finding the former husband in Contempt because the trial court erred in not granting a continuance and conducting a hearing without the former husband present. The trial court should have granted a continuance based upon the pro se letter from the former husband […]
Tag: legal blog
“So you’re going through a divorce and you’re ready to start cutting ties with everything…don’t change anything just yet.”
Often times at the outset of a divorce, men begin wondering what to do regarding their home, their bills, their insurance policies, etc. They want to begin cutting ties with their old life and begin establishing a new one. More often than not, the appropriate course of action during the pendency of your divorce is […]
Parise v. Selph
Parise v Selph In Parise v. Selph, an Injunction for Protection Against Repeat Violence was reversed and remanded because the Respondent was denied his due process right to present his case.
Possible Alimony Law Changes In The Works
In this edition of the Men’s Rights Law Firm blog, we will discuss the pending alimony law changes that could become reality in the near future. The following is in an FAQ format, and may hold answers to questions by those facing unjust alimony obligations in their divorce decrees: 1. What are your thoughts on […]
How Does Reunification Work In Cases Of Alienation?
If a parent has been absent from a child’s life for a significant time, it may be helpful to hire a mental health professional to assist the temporarily absent parent to reconnect with the child. Children, especially young children, who have not seen a parent for a long time, may be unsure of the parent […]
Arquette v. Rutter
The followingis a child support modification case under UIFSA. The Florida court never obtained subject matter jurisdiction allowing it to modify the foreign court’s child support order, so the modification was void. UIFSA has specific requirements to grant a state the jurisdiction to modify a foreign court’s child support order, none of which was satisfied […]
Ellisen v. Ellisen
The trial court in the attached case misconstrued the pleadings, and denied a petition for modification of alimony based upon the wrong legal standard. When modification of an existing order of support is sought, the proof required to modify a settlement agreement and the proof required to modify an award established by court order shall […]
Gerber v. Gerber
In the following case, the Former Husband was held in contempt of an order regarding the repayment of medical expenses. However, the contempt finding was premature in that the finding of contempt occurred in the same hearing as a clarification of the order at issue. An order that is indefinite or ambiguous may not be […]
Spaulding v. Shane
In the attached domestic violence injunction cas, after more than ten years, the Respondent asked that the Injunction be dissolved. The trial judge denied the request, but the appellate court ruled that the request should have been granted because the trial court used the wrong standard. The Respondent is serving a long prison sentence with […]
Garcell v. Garcell
the following case the appellate court reversed a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage because the Wife was not given an opportunity to fully present her case. At the conclusion of the final hearing, the court granted the Wife 45 days to complete discovery and then to reschedule the hearing to learn about what had […]